DOI: 10.17151/difil.2019.20.35.6
How to Cite
Cely Á., F. E. . (2019). The influence of E. Mach’s empirical criticism in the development of psychology. Discusiones Filosóficas, 20(35), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2019.20.35.6

Authors

Flor Emilce Cely Á.
Universidad El Bosque
florcely@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-1922

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present some elements that permit tracing the influence of Mach in the birth of three psychological approaches: Skinnerian behaviorism, Freudian psychoanalysis and Gestalt psychology. In the first place, the particular interpretation that Skinner and Freud made of some postulates of Mach’s philosophy of science are examined. The second part analyzes the influence of Mach’s work on the Gestalt psychology and the Husserlian phenomenology. Finally, the importance of having made a correct interpretation of the study plan of sensations, from an empirical and experiential point of view in the convergence between Mach’s Psychophysiology and the study of conscious experience in phenomenology, that it would have had for the emerging science of psychology, is emphasized.

Assoun, Paul Laurent. Introducción a la epistemología freudiana. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI, 2001.

Blackmore, John. (Ed.). Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.

Cappelletti Vincenzo. “Discovery and Vocation”. On Scientific Discovery. The Erice Lectures 1977. M. Grmek et al., editores. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1977. 211-226.

Cavell Marcia. La mente psicoanalítica. De Freud a la filosofía. Ciudad de México: Paidós, 2000.

Cekic Miodrag. “Mach’s Phenomenalism as a link between Physics and Psychology”. Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. J. Blackmore, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992. 201-214.

Cely, Flor Emilce. “Razones y causas en el psicoanálisis freudiano”. Eidos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad del Norte. 23, 2015: 137-158.

Chomsky Noam. “Crítica de «Verbal Behaviour» de B. F. Skinner”. ¿Chomsky o Skinner? La génesis del lenguaje. Barcelona: Fontanella, 1977.

Ehrenfels Christian von. “On ‘Gestalt Qualities’” (‘Ober Gestaitqualitiiten’, originalmente publicado en Vierteljahreschrift for wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14 (1890), 242-292). Traducción recuperada del sitio https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/178b/b13c2f299c5a544d1c5339cff9eaae2be13c.pdf

Einstein Albert. “Ernst Mach”. Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. J. Blackmore, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992. 154-159 (original de 1916).

Freud Sigmund. Introducción al narcisismo. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1976a.

Freud Sigmund. Pulsiones y destinos de la pulsión. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1976b.

Fuchs Thomas. “Body Memory and the Unconscious.” Founding Psychoanalysis. Phenomenological Theory of Subjectivity and the Psychoanalytical Experience. D. Lohmar y J. Brudzinska, editores. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2011. 69-82.

Henning Michelle. “Don’t Touch Me (I’m Electric): On Gender and Sensation in Modernity”. Women’s Bodies Discipline and Transgression. Jane Arthurs & Jean Grimshaw, editoras. London: Cassell, 1999. 17-47.

Husserl Edmund. Investigaciones lógicas. Madrid: Alianza, 1982.

Mach Ernst. “A Draft Foreword to the Russian Translation of Die Analyse der Empfindungen”. Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. J. Blackmore, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992. 115-117 (original de 1906/1907).

Mach Ernst. “Sensory Elements and Scientific Concepts”. Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. J. Blackmore, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992. 118-126 (original de 1910a).

Mach Ernst. “The Leading Thoughts of my Scientific Epistemology and its Acceptance by Contemporaries”. Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. . J. Blackmore, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992. 133-139 (original de 1910b).

Mach Ernst. Conocimiento y error. Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe, 1948.

Mach Ernst. The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1984.

Merleau-Ponty Maurice. El ojo y el espíritu. Madrid: Trotta, 2013.

Merleau-Ponty Maurice. Fenomenología de la percepción. Barcelona: Planeta-Agostini, 1985.

Merleau-Ponty Maurice. La estructura del comportamiento. Buenos Aires: Hachette, 1953.

Moran Dermot. Introducción a la fenomenología. Barcelona: Anthropos, 2011.

Mulligan Kevin. & Barry Smith. “Mach and Ehrenfels: The Foundations of Gestalt Theory”. Foundations of Gestalt Theory. B. Smith, editor. Munich: Philosophia, 1988.

Noé Keiichi. “Mach’s Relativism vs. Apriorism and the Mechanistic World View”. Ernst Mach. A Deeper look. Documents and New Perspectives. J. Blackmore, editor. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992. 229-241.

Piaget Jean. Introducción a la epistemología genética. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1978.

Pojman Paul. “Ernst Mach”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Web 18 jun. 2017 https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ernst-mach/2009.

Popper Karl. Post Scriptum a la lógica de la investigación científica. Realismo y el objetivo de la ciencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1985.

Skinner Burrhus Frederic. Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.

Skinner Burrhus Frederic. Beyond Freedom and Dignity. London: Penguin Books, 1976.

Skinner Burrhus Frederic. Sobre el conductismo. Barcelona: Planeta, 1987.

Skinner Burrhus Frederic. Tecnología de la enseñanza. Barcelona: Labor, 1970.

Smith Laurence. Conductismo y positivismo lógico. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer, 1994.

Wilkes Kathleen. “Anthropomorphism and Analogy in Psychology”. The Philosophical Quarterly. 25 (99), 1975: 126-137.
Sistema OJS - Metabiblioteca |