PDF (Español)
FLIP
##plugins.gregg.article.details.published##: 2012-07-01
Como Citar
Gómez, J. A. (2012). -. Discusiones Filosóficas, 13(21), 225–243. Recuperado de https://ucaldas.metarevistas.org/index.php/discusionesfilosoficas/article/view/681
Fomatos de Citação
Autores
Resumo
-
Palavras-chave:
Referências
Abbey, Ruth. “Is liberalism now an essentially contested concept?” New Political Science. Dec. 2005: 461-480. Print.
Aristóteles. Retórica. Madrid: Gredos, 1990. Impreso.
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. “Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications”. Journal of Political Ideologies. Oct. 2006: 211-246. Print.
Connelly, Steve. “Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept”. Local Environment. Jun. 2007: 259-278. Print.
Connolly, William. The terms of political discourse. 3rd ed. London: WileyBlackwell, 1993. Print.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Verdad y método II. Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme, 2004. Impreso.
Gallie, Walter Bryce. Conceptos esencialmente impugnados. Vol. 49. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la UNAM, 1998. Impreso.
Grafstein, Robert. “A realist foundation for essentially contested political concepts”. The Western Political Quarterly. Mar. 1988: 9-28. Print.
Gray, John. “On liberty, liberalism and essential contestability”. British Journal of Political Science. Oct. 1978: 385-402. Print.
Hamilton, Richard Paul. “Love as a contested concept.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Sep. 2006: 239-254. Print.
Hurley, S. L. Natural reasons: Personality and polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.
Klumpp, James. “A dramatistic approach to fields”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
Lakoff, George. The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-Century American politics with an 18th-Century brain. New York: Viking Adult, 2008. Print.
Lausberg, Heinrich. Manual de retórica literaria Tomo I. Madrid: Gredos, 1976. Impreso.
Lukes, Steven. El poder: un enfoque radical. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España, 1985. Impreso.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “The essential contestability of some social concepts”. Ethics. Oct. 1973: 1-9. Print.
Mason, Andrew. “Justice, contestability, and conceptions of the Good”. Utilitas. Nov. 1996: 295-305. Print.
McKerrow, R. E. “Argument communities”. Trapp, R. and J. Schuetz (ed.). Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. Illinois: IDEBATE Press, 2006. Print.
---. “On fields and rational enterprises: A Reply to Willard”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
Miller, D. “Linguistic philosophy and political theory”. Miller, D. and L. Siedentop (ed.). The nature of political theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983. Impreso.
Moten, Abdul. “Understanding terrorism: Contested concept, conflicting perspectives and shattering consequences”. Intellectual Discourse. Jan. 2010: 35-63. Online.
Reitan, Eric. “Rape as an essentially contested concept”. Hypatia. May. 2001: 43-66. Print.
Rowland, Robert. “Argument fields”. Benoit, William L., Hample, Dale and Pamela J. Benoit. Readings in argumentation. New York: Foris Publ., 1992. Print.
---. “Purpose, argument fields, and theoretical justification”. Argumentation. May. 2008: 235-250. Print.
Toulmin, Stephen. Los usos de la argumentación. Barcelona: Peninsula, 2007. Impreso.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy. Mar. 2002: 137-164. Print.
Willard, Arthur. “Field theory: A cartesian meditation”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
---. “Some questions about Toulmi’s view of argument fields”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
Aristóteles. Retórica. Madrid: Gredos, 1990. Impreso.
Collier, David, Fernando Daniel Hidalgo, and Andra Olivia Maciuceanu. “Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications”. Journal of Political Ideologies. Oct. 2006: 211-246. Print.
Connelly, Steve. “Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept”. Local Environment. Jun. 2007: 259-278. Print.
Connolly, William. The terms of political discourse. 3rd ed. London: WileyBlackwell, 1993. Print.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Verdad y método II. Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme, 2004. Impreso.
Gallie, Walter Bryce. Conceptos esencialmente impugnados. Vol. 49. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la UNAM, 1998. Impreso.
Grafstein, Robert. “A realist foundation for essentially contested political concepts”. The Western Political Quarterly. Mar. 1988: 9-28. Print.
Gray, John. “On liberty, liberalism and essential contestability”. British Journal of Political Science. Oct. 1978: 385-402. Print.
Hamilton, Richard Paul. “Love as a contested concept.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Sep. 2006: 239-254. Print.
Hurley, S. L. Natural reasons: Personality and polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.
Klumpp, James. “A dramatistic approach to fields”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
Lakoff, George. The political mind: Why you can’t understand 21st-Century American politics with an 18th-Century brain. New York: Viking Adult, 2008. Print.
Lausberg, Heinrich. Manual de retórica literaria Tomo I. Madrid: Gredos, 1976. Impreso.
Lukes, Steven. El poder: un enfoque radical. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España, 1985. Impreso.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. “The essential contestability of some social concepts”. Ethics. Oct. 1973: 1-9. Print.
Mason, Andrew. “Justice, contestability, and conceptions of the Good”. Utilitas. Nov. 1996: 295-305. Print.
McKerrow, R. E. “Argument communities”. Trapp, R. and J. Schuetz (ed.). Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. Illinois: IDEBATE Press, 2006. Print.
---. “On fields and rational enterprises: A Reply to Willard”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
Miller, D. “Linguistic philosophy and political theory”. Miller, D. and L. Siedentop (ed.). The nature of political theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983. Impreso.
Moten, Abdul. “Understanding terrorism: Contested concept, conflicting perspectives and shattering consequences”. Intellectual Discourse. Jan. 2010: 35-63. Online.
Reitan, Eric. “Rape as an essentially contested concept”. Hypatia. May. 2001: 43-66. Print.
Rowland, Robert. “Argument fields”. Benoit, William L., Hample, Dale and Pamela J. Benoit. Readings in argumentation. New York: Foris Publ., 1992. Print.
---. “Purpose, argument fields, and theoretical justification”. Argumentation. May. 2008: 235-250. Print.
Toulmin, Stephen. Los usos de la argumentación. Barcelona: Peninsula, 2007. Impreso.
Waldron, Jeremy. “Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)?” Law and Philosophy. Mar. 2002: 137-164. Print.
Willard, Arthur. “Field theory: A cartesian meditation”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
---. “Some questions about Toulmi’s view of argument fields”. Ziegelmueller, G. and J. Rhodes (eds.). Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation. Utah: Speech Communication Association, 1981. Print.
