PDF (Español)
FLIP
Publication Date: 2005-01-01
How to Cite
Gargarella, R. (2005). -. Jurídicas, 2(1), 9–26. Retrieved from https://ucaldas.metarevistas.org/index.php/juridicas/article/view/6437
More Citation Formats
Authors
Abstract
In this brief essay, I will analyze Carlos Santiago Nino' intuitions (visitant professor at Yale University) about an "unfinished" question in his work that him revised permanently until his last book: the judicial control of constitutionality (judicial review), examining it into the light of the «popular constitutionalism», a trend of thought very critical with the well known approaches on the judicial review, that had special reception in Yale University. In order to take ahead this analysis, in the first part Twill expose, in a very synthetic way, the vision that Nino presented in his last works on the judicial review. Then, in the second part, I will summarize some of the main lines of analyses characteristic of the «popular constitutionalism» for, finally, to explore in the third and last section, possible agreements and disagreements between both perspectives.
Keywords:
References
ACKERMAN, Bruce (1991) We the People. Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
AMAR, Amar (1987) "Of Sovereignty and Federalism", en: 96 Yale Law Journal 1425.
(1988) "The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V, en: 94 Columbia Law Review 457.
BALKIN, Jack (1995) "Populism and Progressivism as Constitutional Categories", en: 104 Yale Law Journal 1935.
(2003) "Idolatry and Faith: The Jurisprudence of Sanford Levinson", en: 38 Tulsa Law Review 553.
(2004) "Respect-Worthy: Frank Michelman and the Legitimate Constitution", en: 39 Tulsa Law Review 485.
— LEVINSON, Sanford (2001) "Understanding the Constitutional Revolution", en: Virginia Law Review, vol. 87, n. 6.
COVER, Robert (1983) "The Supreme Court, 1982 Term- Foreword: Nomos and Narrative",. en: 97 Harvard Law Review 4.
DAHL, Robert (1957) "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker", en: 6 Journal of Public Law 279.
ERICK, Patricia— SILBEY, Susan (1998) The Common Place of Law, Illinois: Chicago University Press.
GRABER, Mark A. (2000) "The Law Professor as Populist", en: 34 University of Richmond Law Review 373.
GRIFFIN, Stephen M. (1996) American Constitutionalism.Princeton University Press.
KRAMER, Larry (2001) "The Supreme Court, 2000 Term-Foreword: We the Court", en: 115 Harvard University Press 4,130-58.
(2004) The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004b) "Popular Constitutionalism, Circa 2004", en: 92 California Law Review 959.
LEVINSON, Sanford (1988) Constitutional Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
(1999) "Constitutional Populism: Is It Time for `We the People' to Demand an Article Five Convention", en: 4 Widener Law Symposium Journal 211.
McCANN, Michael (1992) "Reform Litigation on Trial", en: 17 Law & Social Inquiry 715.
(1996) "Causal vs. Constitutive Explanations", en: 21 Law & Sociallnquiry 457.
(1999) "How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives", en: Howard Gillman — Cornell Clayton (eds.) The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. University Press of Kansas.
MICHELMAN, Frank (1999) "Constitutional Authorship by the People", en: 74 Notre Dame Law Review 1605.
(2003) "Ida's Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System", en: 72 Fordham Law Review 345.
MINOW, Martha (1987) "Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover", en: 96 Yale Law Journal 1860.
MOORS, Wayne D. (1996) Constitutional Rights and Powers of the People. Princeton University Press.
NINO, Carlos S. (1993) "On the Exercise of Judicial Review in Argentina", en: Irwin P. Stotzky (ed.) Transition to Democracy in Latin America. The Role of the Judiciary, San Francisco: Westview Press.
(1996) The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
PARKER, Richard (1993) "Here, the People Rule, A Constitutional Populist Manifesto", en: Valparaiso UniversityLawReview, vol. 27, n. 3.
POSNER, Richard (2004) "The People's Court", en: The New Republic, July 19, 32.
POST, Robert C. — SIEGEL, Reva B. (2003) "Protecting the Constitution From the People: Juricentric Restrictions on Section Five Power", en: 78 Indiana Law Journal 33.
(2004) "Popular Constitutionalism, Departamentalism, and Judicial Supremacy", en: 92 California Law Review 1027.
REED, Douglas S. (1999) "Popular Constitutionalism: Toward a Theory of State Constitutional Meaning", en: 30 Rutgers Law Review 871.
ROSENBERC~ GeraldN. (1991) TheHollowHope.• Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
(1996) "Positivism, Interpretivism, and the Study of Law. McCann Rights at Work", en: 21 Law & Social Inquiry 435.
SAGER, Lawrence G (1993) "Justice in Plain Clothes: Reflections on the Thinness of Constitutional Law", en: 88 Northwestern. University Law Review 410.
SANDEL, Michael (1996) Democracy's Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
SIEGEL, Reva B. (2001) "Text in Contest: Gender and the Constitution From a Social Movement Perspective", en: 150 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 297.
TRIBE, Laurence H, (2004) "The People Themselves: Judicial Populism", en: New York Times Sunday Book Review, October 24.
TUSHNET, Mark (1999) Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Princeton University Press.
UNGER, Robert (1996) What Should Legal Analysis Become? Londres: Verso Press.
WALDRON, Jeremy (1999) Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WHITTINGTON, Keith E. (2002) "Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses", en: 80 North Carolina Law Review 773.
AMAR, Amar (1987) "Of Sovereignty and Federalism", en: 96 Yale Law Journal 1425.
(1988) "The Consent of the Governed: Constitutional Amendment Outside Article V, en: 94 Columbia Law Review 457.
BALKIN, Jack (1995) "Populism and Progressivism as Constitutional Categories", en: 104 Yale Law Journal 1935.
(2003) "Idolatry and Faith: The Jurisprudence of Sanford Levinson", en: 38 Tulsa Law Review 553.
(2004) "Respect-Worthy: Frank Michelman and the Legitimate Constitution", en: 39 Tulsa Law Review 485.
— LEVINSON, Sanford (2001) "Understanding the Constitutional Revolution", en: Virginia Law Review, vol. 87, n. 6.
COVER, Robert (1983) "The Supreme Court, 1982 Term- Foreword: Nomos and Narrative",. en: 97 Harvard Law Review 4.
DAHL, Robert (1957) "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker", en: 6 Journal of Public Law 279.
ERICK, Patricia— SILBEY, Susan (1998) The Common Place of Law, Illinois: Chicago University Press.
GRABER, Mark A. (2000) "The Law Professor as Populist", en: 34 University of Richmond Law Review 373.
GRIFFIN, Stephen M. (1996) American Constitutionalism.Princeton University Press.
KRAMER, Larry (2001) "The Supreme Court, 2000 Term-Foreword: We the Court", en: 115 Harvard University Press 4,130-58.
(2004) The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2004b) "Popular Constitutionalism, Circa 2004", en: 92 California Law Review 959.
LEVINSON, Sanford (1988) Constitutional Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
(1999) "Constitutional Populism: Is It Time for `We the People' to Demand an Article Five Convention", en: 4 Widener Law Symposium Journal 211.
McCANN, Michael (1992) "Reform Litigation on Trial", en: 17 Law & Social Inquiry 715.
(1996) "Causal vs. Constitutive Explanations", en: 21 Law & Sociallnquiry 457.
(1999) "How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives", en: Howard Gillman — Cornell Clayton (eds.) The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. University Press of Kansas.
MICHELMAN, Frank (1999) "Constitutional Authorship by the People", en: 74 Notre Dame Law Review 1605.
(2003) "Ida's Way: Constructing the Respect-Worthy Governmental System", en: 72 Fordham Law Review 345.
MINOW, Martha (1987) "Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover", en: 96 Yale Law Journal 1860.
MOORS, Wayne D. (1996) Constitutional Rights and Powers of the People. Princeton University Press.
NINO, Carlos S. (1993) "On the Exercise of Judicial Review in Argentina", en: Irwin P. Stotzky (ed.) Transition to Democracy in Latin America. The Role of the Judiciary, San Francisco: Westview Press.
(1996) The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
PARKER, Richard (1993) "Here, the People Rule, A Constitutional Populist Manifesto", en: Valparaiso UniversityLawReview, vol. 27, n. 3.
POSNER, Richard (2004) "The People's Court", en: The New Republic, July 19, 32.
POST, Robert C. — SIEGEL, Reva B. (2003) "Protecting the Constitution From the People: Juricentric Restrictions on Section Five Power", en: 78 Indiana Law Journal 33.
(2004) "Popular Constitutionalism, Departamentalism, and Judicial Supremacy", en: 92 California Law Review 1027.
REED, Douglas S. (1999) "Popular Constitutionalism: Toward a Theory of State Constitutional Meaning", en: 30 Rutgers Law Review 871.
ROSENBERC~ GeraldN. (1991) TheHollowHope.• Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
(1996) "Positivism, Interpretivism, and the Study of Law. McCann Rights at Work", en: 21 Law & Social Inquiry 435.
SAGER, Lawrence G (1993) "Justice in Plain Clothes: Reflections on the Thinness of Constitutional Law", en: 88 Northwestern. University Law Review 410.
SANDEL, Michael (1996) Democracy's Discontent. America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
SIEGEL, Reva B. (2001) "Text in Contest: Gender and the Constitution From a Social Movement Perspective", en: 150 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 297.
TRIBE, Laurence H, (2004) "The People Themselves: Judicial Populism", en: New York Times Sunday Book Review, October 24.
TUSHNET, Mark (1999) Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts, Princeton University Press.
UNGER, Robert (1996) What Should Legal Analysis Become? Londres: Verso Press.
WALDRON, Jeremy (1999) Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WHITTINGTON, Keith E. (2002) "Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses", en: 80 North Carolina Law Review 773.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
