pdf (Español (España))
FLIP
Authors
Antonio Stalin García Ríos
Perfil Google Scholar
Abstract
This article synthesizes a study on research-creation in doctoral theses of arts and design. The main objective of the inquiry was to examine state of research based on creative practices in doctoral programs of arts and design. Its scope was to understand the participation of creative activity in six theses carried out in two specific research training contexts. The method used consisted of a comparative case study between the doctoral program in design and creation of Universidad de Caldas, Colombia and the doctoral degree in visual arts of Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. For this purpose, two theoretical propositions were elucidated on the theoretical contribution to knowledge and the methodological reliability of the doctoral theses carried out with creative practices. The main results show the trends in each case, presented as codes classified according to two categories consistent with the proposals of the study. Compared to the knowledge category, the comparison of the cases shows concordance between the codes of processes, practice and creation. The codes of the methodology category show similarities between diverse methods, creative practice, narrative, qualitative and audiovisual recording. It is concluded that research-creation can generate useful knowledge to various disciplines, so it must be exposed in a common and explicit academic language, favoring the transmission, debate, negation or affirmation of resulting theories. Theories regarding methodological diversity and the use of creation for the collection and processing of data are also confirmed. The convenience of highlighting the research plan is emphasized fully revealing the creative practices and their articulation with theoretical construction.
Keywords:
References
Archer, B. (1995). The Nature of Research. Co-design. Interdisciplinary Journal of Design, 2(11), 6-13.
Ariza, D. E. (2016). Huellas digitales. Performance digital como profanación del dispositivo prisión [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Caldas].
Basbaum, R. R. (2008). Você gostaria de participar de uma experiência artística? (+ NBP) [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de São Paulo]. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/001728936
Belo, M. (2010). Doctoral Research in Art and Design. Iade, Unidcom I, Av D Carlos, 1-7.
Borgdorff, H. (2010). El debate sobre la investigación en las artes. Cairon. Revista de estudios de danza (13), 25-46.
Cross, N. (1993). Editorial. Design Studies, 14(3), 226-227.
Cuervo, R. (2016). ¿Cómo escuchar la ciudad? La experiencia de los paisajes sonoros urbanos. Manizales [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Caldas]. http://biblio. ucaldas.edu.co:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=63865
Durling, D., & Niedderer, K. (2007). The Benefits and limits of investigative designing. In Proceedings IASDR07. Hong Kong. https://www.sd.polyu. edu.hk/iasdr/proceeding/papers/The%20Benefits%20and%20Limits%20of%20Investigative%20Designing%20%20%20.pdf
Eco, U. (1988). Cómo se hace una tesis: técnica y procedimientos de estudio, investigación y escritura. Bogotá: FICA-Fundación para la Investigacion y la Cultura.
Evans, M. (2010). Researcher practice: Embedding creative practice within doctoral research in industrial design. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), Article M16.
Ferreira, D. P. (2016). Expressividade procedural: narrativas e jogos digitais. [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de São Paulo]. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/002780991
Friedman, K. (2014a). Now that we’re different, what’s still the same? En L. Ravelli, B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield, Doctoral writing in the creative and performing arts (pp. 237-262). Faringdon: Libri Publishing.
Friedman, K. (2014b). Re: How “Design Thinking Research” and “Design Thinking” are related (or not)? Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities. https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=PHD-DESIGN;7c9e3890.1408
Friedman, K., & Ox, J. (2017). PhD in Art and Design. Leonardo, 50(5), 515-519. DOI: 10.1162/LEON_e_01472
Goodrick, D. (2014). Estudios de caso comparativos, Síntesis metodológicas: evaluación de impacto n.º 9. Florencia: Centro de Investigaciones de UNICEF.
Gray, C., & Malins, J. (1993). Research procedures/methodology for artists & designers. Aberdeen: Robert Gordon University. https://openair.rgu.ac.uk/handle/10059/640
Leavy, P. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York: Guilford Publications.
McNiff, S. (2008). Art-Based Research. En G. Knowles & A. Cole, Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 29-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Reilly, L. (2002). An alternative model of “knowledge” for the arts. Working Papers in Art and Design 2.
Silva-Cañaveral, S. (2016). Vestidos Orales y la visibilización de las identidades transgénero en el arte. Una reflexión en torno a la relación entre creación e investigación [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Caldas]. http://biblio.ucaldas.edu.co:8000/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=63586
Sullivan, G. (2011). The Artist as Researcher. New Roles for New Realities. En J. Wesseling, See it Again, Say it Again: The Artist as Researcher (pp. 79-101). Amsterdam: Valiz Antennal.
Yee, J. (2010). Methodological innovation in practice-based design doctorates. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2), Article M15.
Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London: SAGE.
Yin, R. (2003). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. USA: SAGE.
Downloads
