pdf (Español (España))
FLIP
How to Cite
Gómez González, C. ., Lecuona López, M. ., & Hernández, M. C. . (2017). Comparative analysis of design policies in Europe: classification and visualization of strategies. Kepes, 14(15), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.17151/kepes.2017.14.15.5
More Citation Formats
Authors
Carolina Gómez González
Perfil Google Scholar
Manuel Lecuona López
María Cristina Hernández
Abstract
This analysis is part of the doctoral thesis project "The Design System in the Mediterranean Arc Euroregion: priorities for the characterization of a strategic model". Its purpose is to make a comparison between different design policies in Europe.
This study started with a bibliographical review on the implementation of policies for strategic design in different countries and regions of Europe, as well as the analysis of competitiveness corporate ladder, competitiveness in design, innovation performance, etc. Because of these analyses, five countries and one region were selected: United Kingdom, Finland, Denmark, Norway, Estonia and Flanders.
Information coding was conducted following the grounded theory research. Segments of analysis in the literature review, which were not preconceived prior to the initiation of this investigation, were identified and grouped into categories.
Subsequently, matrix analyses and relationship networks or concept maps were used to visually demonstrate and compare the strategies that make up the design policies in each country/region. In addition, a relationship between competitiveness corporate ladder, growth of competitiveness and performance in innovation with the maps of the strategies could be established. The countries in the top 15 of the different rankings are those that have a higher chromatic brand because they have a higher number of strategies that promote design as a strategy.
This comparative analysis can be used in different types of design policies of any territory in order to carry out an initial detection of existing strategies and to know the complexity of a specific design policy.
Keywords:
References
Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de Contenido. (3a Ed). Madrid. Ediciones AKAL.
Calvera, A., Taranto, F., & Veciana, S. (2008). Políticas públicas nacionales para el aprovechamiento estratégico del diseño. Barcelona. Recuperado de http://adp.cat/web/wp-content/uploads/politicas-publicas_apd.pdf
Choi, Y., Cooper, R., Lim, S., & Evans, M. (2010). National Support for Design: Developing Propositional Models. Design Management Review, 21(4), 60–69. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00096.x
Danish Design Centre DDC. (2014). Join Design Society in Denmark. Copenhagen: Danish Design Centre. Recuperado de http://ddc.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/JOIN-THE-DESIGN-SOCIETY-DDC-2014.pdf
Design Council. (2010). A Review by Martin Temple CBE. London. Recuperado de https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32441/10-1178-design-council-review.pdf
Design Council. (2013). Design Review: Principles and Practice. London. Recuperado de http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/DC Cabe Design Review 13_W_0.pdf
Design Flanders. (2006). “Design Makes the Difference” Workshops. SEE Design Bulletin. Issue 2, 9. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEEbulletin - Issue 2 March 2006.pdf
European Commission. (2009). Design as a driver of user-centred innovation (No. SEC(2009)501 final). Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.
European Commission. (2013). Implementing an Action Plan for DesignDriven Innovation (No. SWD(2013) 380 final). Brussels. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13203/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native
Gómez-González, C., Lecuona López, M., & Hernandez, M. C. (2017). Análisis de bibliografía sobre políticas de diseño. IconoFacto.
González García, F., Ibañez Moya, F. C., Casalí Sarasíbar, J., López Rodriguez,J. J., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Una aportación a la mejora de la calidad de la docencia universitaria: Los mapas conceptuales. Pamplona: Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., & Kanerva, M. (2015). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015. Belgium.
Immonen, H., Järvinen, J., & Nieminen, E. (2013). Global Design Watch 2010-Design Policy and Promotion Programmes in Selected Countries and Regions. Aalto University.
Josiassen, A.-D., & Rosted, J. (2014). New Innovation Actors: Design and Technology in the Interest of Society (1a ). (DDC, Ed.). Copenhaguen: Danish Design Centre. Recuperado de http://ddc.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/New_Innovation_actors_gb-DDC-2014.pdf
Ministry of Employment and the Economy, & Ministry of Education and Culture. (2014). Design Finland Programme. Helsinki. Recuperado de https://www.tem.fi/files/39560/design_finland_programme.pdf
Mollerup Designlab A/S. (2003). Establishing the basis for the elaboration of the Estonian design policy measures. Denmark. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/58871
Norwegian Design Council. (2007). Norway: Design Support Programme. SEE Design Bulletin, 50–52. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/uploaded_files/NORWAY Design Support.pdf
Poslawski, G., & Sipelgas, K. (2010). Estonia’s Tiger Leap into the World of Design. Design Management Review, 21(4), 44–51. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00094.x/asset/j.1948-7169.2010.00094.x.pdf;jsessionid=BCB9F28348F2BA62B98B6AF7A63058A2.f02t01?v=1&t=ib2e4nm9&s=cbefff02d71b39881aa1777f5b415636f67b8227
Raulik-Murphy, G. (2010). A comparative analysis of strategies for design promotion in different national contexts. The University of Wales. The University of Wales. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/images/A Comparative Analysis of Strategies for Design Promotion in Different National Contexts - ago2010 - FINAL.pdf
Raulik-Murphy, G., Cawood, G., Larsen, P., & Lewis, A. (2008). A comparative analysis of strategies for design in Finland and Brazil. In Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference (p. 201/1-201/16). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University. Recuperado de http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/452
Rodriguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., & García Jimenez, E. (1999). Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa. Málaga.
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (1998). Metodología de la investigación. (N. Islas López & M. Rocha Martines, Eds.) (Cuarta, Vol. 1). México D.F: Mcgraw-hill México.
Scherfig, C., Brunander, M., & Melander, C. (2010). From the World’s First Design Policy to the World’s Best Design Policy. Design Management Review, 21(4), 6–14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00089.x
See Platform. (2013a). SME Wallet, Flanders, Belgium. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 9., 14–15. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE bulletin issue 9 - June 2013(1).pdf
See Platform. (2013b, December). Design Policy and Promotion Map: Brazil, Estonia, Uruguay. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 10., 3–13. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE bulletin issue 10 - Dec 2013.pdf
SEE Platform. (2012). Estonia’s Design Action Plan 2012–2013. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 8., 6–7. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEEBulletin Issue 8 - Dec 2012.pdf
Sun, Q. (2010). Design Industries and Policies in the UK and China: A Comparison. Design Management Review, 21(4), 70–77. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00097.x
TEKES. (2007). Design 2005. SEE Design Bulletin. Issue 6.
Valcke, J. (2010). Design Policy in Flanders, Belgium. Design Management Review, 21(4), 38–43. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00093.x/pdf
Varguillas, C. (2006). El uso de atlas. ti y la creatividad del investigador en el análisis cualitativo de contenido UPEL. nstituto Pedagógico Rural El Mácaro. Laurus Revista de Educación, 73–87. Recuperado de https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/stmaria/jmurillo/Met_Inves_Avan/Materiales/Varguillas.pdf
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I., Almeigeiras, A. R., Chernobilsky, L. B., Gímenez Béliveau, Verónica Mallimaci, F., Mendizabal, N., & Neiman, G. (2006). Estrategias de Investigación Cualitativa (1a). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Whicher, A. (2014). Design Policy Monitor 2014. Reviewing Innovation and Design Policies across Europe. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 11. Cardiff. Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/10085387/Design_Policy_Monitor_2014
Whicher, A. H., Cawood, G., & Walters, A. T. (2012). Examining Design and Innovation Policies in Europe. In WIRAD (Ed.), Proceedings of 2nd WIRAD Symposium for Emerging Art & Design Researchers (pp. 23–28). Cardiff. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE bulletin 7 - June 2012.pdf
Whicher, A., Swiatek, P., & Cawood, G. (2015). Design Policy Monitor 2015. Cardiff. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE DPM 2015 Jan. pdf
Calvera, A., Taranto, F., & Veciana, S. (2008). Políticas públicas nacionales para el aprovechamiento estratégico del diseño. Barcelona. Recuperado de http://adp.cat/web/wp-content/uploads/politicas-publicas_apd.pdf
Choi, Y., Cooper, R., Lim, S., & Evans, M. (2010). National Support for Design: Developing Propositional Models. Design Management Review, 21(4), 60–69. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00096.x
Danish Design Centre DDC. (2014). Join Design Society in Denmark. Copenhagen: Danish Design Centre. Recuperado de http://ddc.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/JOIN-THE-DESIGN-SOCIETY-DDC-2014.pdf
Design Council. (2010). A Review by Martin Temple CBE. London. Recuperado de https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32441/10-1178-design-council-review.pdf
Design Council. (2013). Design Review: Principles and Practice. London. Recuperado de http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/DC Cabe Design Review 13_W_0.pdf
Design Flanders. (2006). “Design Makes the Difference” Workshops. SEE Design Bulletin. Issue 2, 9. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEEbulletin - Issue 2 March 2006.pdf
European Commission. (2009). Design as a driver of user-centred innovation (No. SEC(2009)501 final). Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.
European Commission. (2013). Implementing an Action Plan for DesignDriven Innovation (No. SWD(2013) 380 final). Brussels. Recuperado de http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/13203/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native
Gómez-González, C., Lecuona López, M., & Hernandez, M. C. (2017). Análisis de bibliografía sobre políticas de diseño. IconoFacto.
González García, F., Ibañez Moya, F. C., Casalí Sarasíbar, J., López Rodriguez,J. J., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Una aportación a la mejora de la calidad de la docencia universitaria: Los mapas conceptuales. Pamplona: Universidad Pública de Navarra.
Hollanders, H., Es-Sadki, N., & Kanerva, M. (2015). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015. Belgium.
Immonen, H., Järvinen, J., & Nieminen, E. (2013). Global Design Watch 2010-Design Policy and Promotion Programmes in Selected Countries and Regions. Aalto University.
Josiassen, A.-D., & Rosted, J. (2014). New Innovation Actors: Design and Technology in the Interest of Society (1a ). (DDC, Ed.). Copenhaguen: Danish Design Centre. Recuperado de http://ddc.dk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/New_Innovation_actors_gb-DDC-2014.pdf
Ministry of Employment and the Economy, & Ministry of Education and Culture. (2014). Design Finland Programme. Helsinki. Recuperado de https://www.tem.fi/files/39560/design_finland_programme.pdf
Mollerup Designlab A/S. (2003). Establishing the basis for the elaboration of the Estonian design policy measures. Denmark. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/58871
Norwegian Design Council. (2007). Norway: Design Support Programme. SEE Design Bulletin, 50–52. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/uploaded_files/NORWAY Design Support.pdf
Poslawski, G., & Sipelgas, K. (2010). Estonia’s Tiger Leap into the World of Design. Design Management Review, 21(4), 44–51. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00094.x/asset/j.1948-7169.2010.00094.x.pdf;jsessionid=BCB9F28348F2BA62B98B6AF7A63058A2.f02t01?v=1&t=ib2e4nm9&s=cbefff02d71b39881aa1777f5b415636f67b8227
Raulik-Murphy, G. (2010). A comparative analysis of strategies for design promotion in different national contexts. The University of Wales. The University of Wales. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/images/A Comparative Analysis of Strategies for Design Promotion in Different National Contexts - ago2010 - FINAL.pdf
Raulik-Murphy, G., Cawood, G., Larsen, P., & Lewis, A. (2008). A comparative analysis of strategies for design in Finland and Brazil. In Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference (p. 201/1-201/16). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University. Recuperado de http://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/452
Rodriguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., & García Jimenez, E. (1999). Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa. Málaga.
Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (1998). Metodología de la investigación. (N. Islas López & M. Rocha Martines, Eds.) (Cuarta, Vol. 1). México D.F: Mcgraw-hill México.
Scherfig, C., Brunander, M., & Melander, C. (2010). From the World’s First Design Policy to the World’s Best Design Policy. Design Management Review, 21(4), 6–14. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00089.x
See Platform. (2013a). SME Wallet, Flanders, Belgium. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 9., 14–15. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE bulletin issue 9 - June 2013(1).pdf
See Platform. (2013b, December). Design Policy and Promotion Map: Brazil, Estonia, Uruguay. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 10., 3–13. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE bulletin issue 10 - Dec 2013.pdf
SEE Platform. (2012). Estonia’s Design Action Plan 2012–2013. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 8., 6–7. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEEBulletin Issue 8 - Dec 2012.pdf
Sun, Q. (2010). Design Industries and Policies in the UK and China: A Comparison. Design Management Review, 21(4), 70–77. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00097.x
TEKES. (2007). Design 2005. SEE Design Bulletin. Issue 6.
Valcke, J. (2010). Design Policy in Flanders, Belgium. Design Management Review, 21(4), 38–43. Recuperado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00093.x/pdf
Varguillas, C. (2006). El uso de atlas. ti y la creatividad del investigador en el análisis cualitativo de contenido UPEL. nstituto Pedagógico Rural El Mácaro. Laurus Revista de Educación, 73–87. Recuperado de https://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/stmaria/jmurillo/Met_Inves_Avan/Materiales/Varguillas.pdf
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I., Almeigeiras, A. R., Chernobilsky, L. B., Gímenez Béliveau, Verónica Mallimaci, F., Mendizabal, N., & Neiman, G. (2006). Estrategias de Investigación Cualitativa (1a). Barcelona: Gedisa.
Whicher, A. (2014). Design Policy Monitor 2014. Reviewing Innovation and Design Policies across Europe. SEE Platform Bulletin. Issue 11. Cardiff. Recuperado de https://www.academia.edu/10085387/Design_Policy_Monitor_2014
Whicher, A. H., Cawood, G., & Walters, A. T. (2012). Examining Design and Innovation Policies in Europe. In WIRAD (Ed.), Proceedings of 2nd WIRAD Symposium for Emerging Art & Design Researchers (pp. 23–28). Cardiff. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE bulletin 7 - June 2012.pdf
Whicher, A., Swiatek, P., & Cawood, G. (2015). Design Policy Monitor 2015. Cardiff. Recuperado de http://www.seeplatform.eu/docs/SEE DPM 2015 Jan. pdf
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
